Legal Opinion

Boozer v. Shelnut

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1930No. 7 Div. 685Published

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This is a suit brought by appellant against appellee to recover claimed commissions for the sale of real estate. There was no testimony in the case except that of the plaintiff, testifying as a witness in his own behalf. Upon the conclusion of his testimony, both plaintiff and defendant rested their cases, whereupon the trial judge gave, at the request of the appellee (defendant), the general affirmative charge in his favor.

The said action of the trial judge must be approved, and the judgment which followed, from which this appeal is taken, affirmed) for at least two, and perhaps three,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minto v. MooreAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Finney v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. De Hart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Northwestern Rug Mfg. Co. v. Russellville Furniture & Mercantile Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API