Legal Opinion

In re J.T.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2019No. 18CA9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

{¶1} Appellant, the child's biological mother, appeals the trial court's judgment that granted Appellee, Jackson County Department of Job and Family Services, permanent custody of her teenage son. Appellant raises two assignments of error. She first contends that the trial court deprived her of her parental rights without due process of law. Appellant asserts that the trial court did not provide her with adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before the court granted Appellee permanent custody of her child. We agree. The trial court did not comply with the procedural…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re C.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In re J.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. In re J.C.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API