Legal Opinion
In Re Visconti
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 7, 2001No. 17-10419PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
J. MICHAEL DEASY, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Askenaizer, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”), filed an objection (Doc. No. 14) (the “Objection”) to the homestead exemption claimed by Marc Visconti (the “Debtor”) in the proceeds from the sale of the Debtor’s former home. The Trustee argues that the Debtor cannot claim a homestead under New Hampshire law because, before filing for bankruptcy, the Debtor conveyed his entire interest in the home to his wife while they were still married, and he was not awarded any ownership interest in the home under the terms of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stewart v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Beland v. GossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Schalebaum v. Town of Wolfeboro (In Re Schalebaum)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
- Bonneville v. BonnevilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Austin v. StanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Katherine R. Brady, Debtor/Appellant v. Lawrence P. Sumski, Chapter 13 Trustee, AppelleeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Katherine R. Brady, Debtor/Appellant v. Lawrence P. Sumski, Chapter 13 Trustee, AppelleeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Brady v. SumskiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Brady v. SumskiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., as Trustee v. Jennifer PikeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.