Legal Opinion
Katherine R. Brady, Debtor/Appellant v. Lawrence P. Sumski, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 15, 2022No. 22-cv-272-SMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Katherine R. Brady, Debtor/Appellant v. Case No. 22-cv-272-SM Opinion No.
2022 DNH 150
Lawrence P. Sumski, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee O R D E R Katherine Brady appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Court holding that she was not entitled to claim a homestead exemption on behalf of her non-debtor husband. The Bankruptcy Court determined that because Brady’s husband did not have an ownership interest in the couple’s home, any homestead interest he had was, under New Hampshire law, at best contingent, and then enforceable only upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Jeffrey Kassel v. Gannett Co., Inc., D/B/A "Usa Today,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Acadia Insurance v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Katherine R. Brady, Debtor/Appellant v. Lawrence P. Sumski, Chapter 13 Trustee, AppelleeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Brady v. SumskiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Brady v. SumskiDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023