Legal Opinion

Schalebaum v. Town of Wolfeboro (In Re Schalebaum)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 19, 2001No. 19-10145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARK W. VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

The Court has before it the Debtor’s motion to avoid lien pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2). In his motion, the Debtor seeks to avoid an alleged attachmenVjudi-cial lien on proceeds from the sale of real estate that he alleges impairs his homestead exemption. He also seeks to avoid an attachmenVjudicial lien on business property that he alleges impairs his wild-card exemption. In most cases, this type of motion involves nothing more than applying the mathematical formula provided by section 522(f). However, in order to utilize section 522(f),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beland v. GossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. In Re WilliamsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Gerrish v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  4. Vaillancourt v. Granite Group (In Re Vaillancourt)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Contrevo v. Mercury Finance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re ViscontiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  3. In Re ContrevoNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Landry v. LandrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In Re DubravskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API