Legal Opinion

Irving Trust Co. v. Gomez

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 23, 1983No. Nos. 82 Civ. 3183 (LBS), 82 Civ. 6370 (LBS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*275OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth the basis of the Court’s ruling of May 9,1983, affirmed on reconsideration on May 31, 1983, requiring production of certain documents as to which Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), has asserted attorney-client privilege and work-product protection and which were presented to the Court on the consent of the parties for in camera inspection.1 Although disclosed informally and ex parte to counsel for Chase, the basis for the Court’s ruling is not known to counsel for Daniel Bulos, the party seeking production, nor can…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Francis I. Du Pont & Co., a Partnership Composed of Edmond Du Pont, in Interpleader and v. Al B. Sheen and John F. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Diamond v. StrattonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Irving Trust Co. v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  2. Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Blanchard v. EdgeMark Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  5. Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API