Legal Opinion

Mills v. Esmark, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 18, 1981No. 81 C 1877PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Caryn J. Mills and Susan M. Mills brought this derivative action as shareholders of Esmark, Inc. (“Esmark”), a Delaware corporation, alleging that certain officers of Esmark received cash payments and assignments of restricted Esmark stock and performance units in violation of the 1979 Stock Option Plan and Long Term Growth Plan adopted by the shareholders of Esmark, and in violation of the fiduciary *71duty owed to the shareholders by the directors and officers. Plaintiffs have named as defendants, Esmark, the officers receiving the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Mollie Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. Siegal v. MerrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Zilker v. KleinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Allison Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  2. Stanley M. Grossman v. Edward C. Johnson, 3rdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  3. Rich ex rel. Fuqi International, Inc. v. Yu Kwai ChongCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  4. Abbey v. Computer & Communications Technology Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1983
  5. Miller v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API