Legal Opinion
Siegal v. Merrick
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 1979No. Nos. 74 Civ. 2475, 74 Civ. 2630PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
On August 31, 1979, this court issued an opinion and accompanying order providing that proposed intervenor Lucker would “have twenty days from the date of this order to make a demand on the current board of directors of Fox [defendant Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.], in compliance with Rule 23.1, Fed.R.Civ.P., or state in detail his reasons for not doing so.” The court’s order further provided that if the proposed intervenor “fails to comply with this order, or if the court finds that the reasons he gives are insufficient to excuse demand on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Abbey v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Anita B. Brody v. Chemical Bank, and Pennsylvania CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Puma v. MarriottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
- Maldonado v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Stenson v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Abbey v. Computer & Communications Technology Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.