Legal Opinion

Uhrman v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1957PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

The defendant-appellant challenges the trial court’s findings that (1) the premises were not as free from danger as the nature of the employment would reasonably permit, (2) defendant had actual or constructive notice of such unsafe condition, and (3) plaintiff Uhrman was free from negligence in respect to the damage incurred by him. Our conclusion is that all of the findings have adequate support in the evidence, and that there was no error in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

1. Place unsafe. The area where the accident occurred was a place of employment and plaintiff was a frequenter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Schoedel v. State Bank of NewburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Williams v. International Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peschel v. KlugWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API