Legal Opinion

Schoedel v. State Bank of Newburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1944PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The State Bank of Newburg is situated in the village of Newburg, and defendant, Isselman, is its cashier. Plaintiff resides in the state of New York. On March 16, 1931, Charles Schoedel, as agent for plaintiff, went to defendant bank looking for the purchase of a first mortgage on farm property. The bank owned a mortgage on the Fahney farm dated January 27, 1922, and recorded January 28, 1922. Charles Schoedel bought it for plaintiff upon defendants’ representation that it was a first mortgage. In fact, there was another mortgage upon the same farm dated and recorded April IS, 1929, anda…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMahon v. McGrawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Palotta v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Fox v. ZimmermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Frank v. State Ex Rel. MeiersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Fuetsch v. FahneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Marian Hutter Owen v. Herbert Wangerin, Mary Wangerin, Dave ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Strack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Romero v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API