Legal Opinion

Gilbert Construction Co. v. Gross

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1973No. [No. 73, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.

This case arises from the fact that ductless furnaces installed in newly constructed suburban houses sold by the defendant (appellant) and purchased by the plaintiffs (appellees) were ill-adapted or inadequate for the purpose of heating these houses. The plaintiffs (sometimes referred to below as the “Purchasers”) brought suit for breach of contract and recovered judgment for $8,000 apportioned at the rate of $250 per plaintiff, or $500 per house, since there were two purchasers of each house (a husband and wife in each instance).

The defendant (sometimes referred to below as the “Developer”)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Markoff v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Edison Realty Co. v. BauernschubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Duplex Envelope Co. v. Baltimore Post Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Rosenthal v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Heckrotte v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Fegeas v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Cohen v. VivianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Safer v. PerperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API