Pickens v. State

Indictment. The charge is that Henry Pick-ens on, &c., at, &c., did sell for one dime, barter for, and give away, two gills of intoxicating liquor, &c-, he, the said Henry, not being licensed, &c. Motion to quash overruled. Plea, not guilty. Einding for the State. New trial refused, and judgment.

The facts are these: One Nathaniel Martin, in September, 1861, took out license to sell intoxicating liquors, in the same house in which the sales, charged in the indictment, were made. He, Martin, carried on the business of retailing intoxicating liquors, in that house, under his license, until…