Legal Opinion

Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Hendrickson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-0576Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBE, : ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE : NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBAL : Civil Action No.: 20-576 (RC) HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, : : Re Document Nos.: 47, 53, 55, 58, 59, Plaintiff, : 63, 70 : v. : : STEPHANIE POLLACK, : Acting Administrator, Federal Highway : Administration, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 47); GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART AGENCY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 63); DENYING NARRAGANSETT’S MOTION FOR…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API