Legal Opinion
State v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 9, 1981No. C 78-12-20605, CA 16716PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*163GILLETTE, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), ORS 475.992, and unlawful possession of a weapon, ORS 166.250. We affirm.
The pertinent portions of the indictment are set out in the margin.1 The major issues on appeal are the validity of the searches of defendant’s person and the car which he had been driving. In discussing them, we relate the evidence as presented to the trial court at the hearing on the motion to suppress. Defendant was stopped by a police officer, accompanied by a trainee, for driving through a red light.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Putnam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. StathamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981