Legal Opinion
Roberto Cruz-Mayaho v. Eric Holder
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 17, 2012No. 10-1634, 11-2914, 11-3512PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Roberto Cruz-Mayaho has been fighting removal from the United States with every tool he can find, and then some. His is a somewhat unusual case, however, because (at least initially) he was neither claiming a right to asylum or related relief nor was he asserting that he has a right to adjust his status because of something like employment or a new marriage to a U.S. citizen. Instead, desperate to avoid being returned to his native Mexico, he has pursued cancellation of removal based on alleged “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to his young U.S.-citizen…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Del Marcelle v. Brown County Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- ANDAZOLABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Khan v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Ricardo Calma v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jose Zambrano v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Ricardo Sanchez v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Charuc v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Francisco Cruz-Velasco v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Marcos Ortiz-Cervantes v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.