Legal Opinion
Kast v. Jackson & Moyer, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1942No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stadteeld, J.,
Opinion by
The essential facts are not in dispute and are set forth in the opinion of the court helow by Jones, J. from which we quote as follows: “The action is one in assumpsit based upon a written contract. It was tried without a jury by agreement of the parties. The court found for the defendant, whereupon the plaintiffs filed a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. After oral argument had and written briefs filed the motions were dismissed.
“The defendant by a written contract made and dated ‘10/24/35’ engaged the services of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barnhart v. RiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- Denniston v. SchaalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Markides v. SofferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Ruck v. VassalottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Williamsport Wire Rope Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Guaranty Trust Company of New York v. Williamsport Wire Rope Company, Carl C. Gehron, George R. Shepherd, Intervening v. Bethlehem Steel Company, Raymond D. Colble, D/B/A Interstate Finance & Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Rate Consulting Corp. v. Wolfson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1942