Legal Opinion

Ruck v. Vassalotti

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1942No. Appeal, 140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by him because of defendant’s breach of a written contract of employment. The case was tried in the municipal court before a judge without a jury, who found for plaintiff in the amount defendant admitted to be due plaintiff. Plaintiff’s motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the finding were dismissed, and he took this appeal.

The written contract is as follows:

“AGREEMENT OF SALE

Nicholas Vassalotti vs. Andrew F. Ruck and Oonrad Schneider.

Mr. Vassalotti…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Knight v. Gulf Refining CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Federal Sales Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Smith v. Gold, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API