(PC) Gordon v. Cooper
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUSTIN THOMAS GORDON, No. 2:24-cv-2741 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JIM COOPER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the 20 Court. 21 As discussed below, plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed with leave to amend. 22 I. SCREENING…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.