Legal Opinion

(PC) Gordon v. Cooper

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 1, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02741Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUSTIN THOMAS GORDON, No. 2:24-cv-2741 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JIM COOPER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the 20 Court. 21 As discussed below, plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed with leave to amend. 22 I. SCREENING…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API