Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Hague

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1896No. 6382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Kearney county. Tried below before Beall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Iryine, C.

This was an action under Compiled Statutes, chapter 21, by Hague, as executor of Robert P. Stein, deceased, against tbe Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, on account of injuries causing tbe death of decedent. Tbe plaintiff bad a verdict and judgment for $4,000. *98The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is-presented for review by a direct assignment of error, and also by an assignment based on the refusal of the court to give an instruction directing a verdict for the defendant. In support of these assignments the railroad company contends, first, that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BaierNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railroad v. HedgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LandauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Omaha & R. V. R. v. CholletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ZerneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HyattNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Clark v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Painter v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API