Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Landauer
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tlie district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is a petition in error by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, and brings into this court for review a judgment recovered by the defendant in error for personal injuries alleged to have been received by her in ¿lighting from a train of the plaintiff in error at Cushman Park near Lincoln. It appears from the petition that the plaintiff below, Minnie Landauer, (now Minnie Parr), on the 5th day of July, 1889, purchased from the defendant below a first class ticket from Lincoln to Cushman park, and that upon the arrival of the train upon which she was a passenger at the last…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trigg v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. ScurrMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- Omaha & R. V. R. v. CholletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Dunbier v. DayNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
- City of Lincoln v. GillilanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Modern Woodman Accident Ass'n v. ShryockNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Kelly v. GagnonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Omaha Street Railway Co. v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- St. Joseph & Grand Island Railroad v. HedgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.