Legal Opinion
Coronado v. Schoenmann Produce Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided February 6, 2003No. 14-99-01335-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
Our opinion issued December 20, 2001 is withdrawn. We overrule appellants’ motion for rehearing and issue this substitute opinion.
Appellants Cenobio Coronado and Ofelia Coronado, individually and as next friends of their children, Armando, Alicia, Jorge, and Anna Christina (the “Coronados”), appeal from the trial court’s take-nothing judgment entered in favor of appellee Schoenmann Produce Co. We affirm.
I. Background
Farming Technologies, Inc. (“FTI”) packages and sells potatoes through distributors under the registered trademark name of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Kroger Co. v. KengTexas Supreme Court · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wingfoot Enterprises v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Donald Bishop v. Nabisco, Inc. and Kraft Foods North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Gina Lively and Robert Lively v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Huguley Memorial Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Gina Lively and Robert Lively v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. D/B/A Huguley Memorial Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- Houston First Corporation v. Jesse Valma, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.