Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Davis

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1926No. 6,035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toole

The primary relief sought in this action is the compelling of an accounting and disclosure of the rents and profits of property which was sold under execution and received by L. Y. Davis, as the purchaser thereof; the action being brought by plaintiff, as the judgment debtor, by virtue of which judgment the property was sold. Ancillary relief is also sought in restraint of the issuance of a sheriff’s deed to the purchaser, and to compel an acceptance by the sheriff of the county in which the property was situate of the amount which should be found due and necessary to redeem the property.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. McQueeney v. ToomeyMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Citizens' National Bank v. Western Loan & Building Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Banking Corp. v. HeinMontana Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CrimminsOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wasatch Oil & Gas, L.L.C. v. ReottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API