Griffin v. James Butler Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
The case for the plaintiff-respondent was that she had bought from appellant company a can of canned peaches for use as food, and had been made violently ill as a result of eating part of the contents of the can. She based her suit on warranty, express or implied, or both, that the peaches were wholesome and fit for consumption by her, and on alleged breach of that warranty. Defendant answered with a general denial. The court denied a motion to nonsuit on the ground that there was no evidence to indicate either that the peaches were unfit for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Edwards v. ParsellsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Magrine v. SPECTORNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Promaulayko v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Bonenberger v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.