Legal Opinion

De Lillo Construction Co. v. Lizza & Sons, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

In this action against the defendant contractor, the plaintiff subcontractor seeks: (1) to foreclose two mechanics’ liens for work allegedly performed under the subcontract; (2) to recover on the labor and material bond given by defendant contractor and its surety; (3) to recover for work and extra work allegedly performed under its subcontract and for loss of profits thereunder; (4) to recover additional damages resulting from defendant’s alleged interference with and delays of plaintiff in the prosecution of its work under the subcontract; and (5) a recovery under former section 25-a of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Matter of Young v. Crescent Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Stephan Riess and Thelma McKinney Riess v. C. W. Murchison and Simi Valley Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Gersh v. Concept House, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  5. In re the Arbitration between Montgomery-Otsego-Schoharie Solid Waste Management Authority & Bonded Insulation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API