Legal Opinion
Vreeman v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 25, 1984No. CO-83-479PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
On this record, the plaintiff purchaser has made out a jury issue on general damages for purchase of an allegedly defective mobile home, and the trial court should not have directed a verdict on this ground in favor of the defendant mobile home manufacturer. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
In March 1978, plaintiff-appellant Joseph Vreeman purchased a new mobile home from a local dealer for $16,900. The mobile home was manufactured by defendant-respondent Champion Home Builders, Inc., and was installed by the local dealer onto a foundation erected by a contractor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Holm v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Twin Lakes Manufacturing Co. v. CoffeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Alafoss, H. F. v. Premium Corporation of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re James R. Ahlers and Mary M. Ahlers, Debtors. James R. Ahlers and Mary M. Ahlers v. Norwest Bank Worthington and Federal Land Bank, in Re James R. Ahlers and Mary M. Ahlers, Debtors. Norwest Bank Worthington, N.A. v. James R. Ahlers and Mary M. AhlersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Williamson v. PrasciunasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Universal Lending Corp. v. WIRTH COMPANIESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Ahlers v. Norwest Bank WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016