Legal Opinion
Bush v. Michelin Tire Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 16, 1996No. 3:90-cv-00858PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
The Court now considers numerous evidentiary issues which go to the heart of Plaintiffs’ products liability claims. 1 In particular, the Court will consider the potential testimony of George Edwards as well as reconsidering several other related issues. In general, the Court must consider what testimony is relevant and fair for purposes of proving claims under strict liability and negligence. The issues are confusing to say the least. Kentucky courts have struggled through the years to draw lines between relevant evidence and evidence which is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Forrest A. Flaminio and Gloria Flaminio v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Savage v. Three Rivers Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Tuer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Burton v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.Arizona Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.