Legal Opinion
Haas v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 19, 1994No. 1:93-cr-00158PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Carroll and Elaine Haas brought this action to recover a tax refund of $48,-511.00 plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. This matter is presently before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties agree that the material facts are not in dispute.
Factual Background
On February 11,1991, plaintiffs filed claim forms with the Internal Revenue Service seeking a refund of $21,400.00 for taxable year ending December 31, 1985, $25,486.00 for taxable year ending December 1986 and $1,625.00 for taxable year ending December 1987. Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allbritton v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994