Allbritton v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this appeal from the Tax Court’s grant of plaintiffs-appellees’ motion for summary judgment, the defendant-appellant Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) asserts error in the court’s determination that Section 163(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code permits a taxpayer to carry over and deduct investment interest expense in excess of taxable income. We review this question of law de novo. 1
The plaintiffs-appellees (Taxpayers) claimed deductions in 1985 and 1986 for carryover investment interest expense that was not deductible in 1984 under Section 163(d)(1). 2 The carryover to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Estate of Frank Martin Perry, Sr., Deceased, Michael C. Perry, Whit S. Perry, and Robert S. Perry, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Lenz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Harris v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Arthur Beyer Catherine A. Beyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nalle v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995