Legal Opinion

Allbritton v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1994No. 94-40277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this appeal from the Tax Court’s grant of plaintiffs-appellees’ motion for summary judgment, the defendant-appellant Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) asserts error in the court’s determination that Section 163(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code permits a taxpayer to carry over and deduct investment interest expense in excess of taxable income. We review this question of law de novo. 1

The plaintiffs-appellees (Taxpayers) claimed deductions in 1985 and 1986 for carryover investment interest expense that was not deductible in 1984 under Section 163(d)(1). 2 The carryover to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Estate of Frank Martin Perry, Sr., Deceased, Michael C. Perry, Whit S. Perry, and Robert S. Perry, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lenz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Harris v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Arthur Beyer Catherine A. Beyer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nalle v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API