Legal Opinion
Artusa v. Costco Wholesale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*500In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated February 14, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
“A verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the evidence preponderates so heavily in favor of the moving party that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Salim v Gomez, 20 AD3d 410 [2005]; see Lolik v Big…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Moisakis v. Allied Building Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McElroy v. YousufAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- O'Donnell v. CalderonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Salim v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Palermo v. Original California Taqueria, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kihl v. PfefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Martinez v. TeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Pelletier v. LahmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pelletier v. LahmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013