Legal Opinion

Salim v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated October 15, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon an order of the same court dated September 10, 2003, denying his motion pursuant to CELÉ 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and on the ground that it was the product of substantial confusion among the jurors, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. O'Donnell v. CalderonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. McLoughlin v. AchillesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kihl v. PfefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Soto v. FamulariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Artusa v. Costco WholesaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Goldman & Associates, LLP v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Goldman & Associates, LLP v. GoldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API