Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Unemployment Compensation Review Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2013No. 2012-0717Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Bernard v. Unemp. Comp. Rev. Comm., 136 Ohio St.3d 264,

2013-Ohio-3121.] BERNARD, APPELLANT, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION REVIEW COMMISSION; BARRY AND PATRICIA WAKEMAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Bernard v. Unemp. Comp. Rev. Comm., 136 Ohio St.3d 264,

2013-Ohio-3121.] R.C. 4141.28(H)—Agency’s interpretation of ambiguous statute is lawful and reasonable—R.C. 4141.01—Earnings deposited into a flexible-spending account for reimbursement of medical costs under an employer’s cafeteria plan do not qualify as remuneration for purposes of determining an employee’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. University Hospital v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lang v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API