Legal Opinion
Lang v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 2012No. 2011-1740PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we must determine whether appellant, Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services (“ODJFS”), properly denied applications for federal wage subsidies filed by appellees, three former employees of American Standard who later were reemployed at a lower wage before they reached the age of 50. Because ODJFS offered a reasonable interpretation of ambiguous language in the federal statute that established the wage subsidies, we conclude that ODJFS did not improperly deny the applications.
I. Facts
A. Statutory Background
{¶ 2} In 2002, Congress created a program called Alternative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ConsilioOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Willow Grove v. Olmstead Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Thomas v. Logue, Admr. of Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.