Harbor Ins. Co. v. Blackwelder
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These appeals are from final judgments entered upon jury verdicts in favor of two classes of plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were all participants in an insurance plan that, due to underfunding, was unable to pay its obligations and failed. Because the plan in question is not a "governmental plan," as that term is used in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.), we hold that, except for their fraud claims against Life and Health Services, Inc. ("L H"), and its president, Robert Wilder, the plaintiffs' common law claims are preempted by ERISA;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- HealthAmerica v. MentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Feinstein v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte Household Retail Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Pace v. Signal Technology Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Haywood v. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte AmSouth BancorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte Fowl River Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.