In Re Stone
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
We issued a writ of habeas corpus and an ancillary writ of certiorari on the personal petition of the prisoner to inquire into the cause of his detention. In compliance with the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §15210 [Stat. Ann. §27.2254]), petitioner alleged that he is not ‘ ‘ convicted, or in execution, upon legal process, civil or criminal” (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 15207 [Stat. Ann. § 27.2251]), and that therefore he is entitled to prosecute the writ of habeas corpus. If we find that petitioner is confined under legal criminal process, the proceeding must be dismissed. In re Lupu, 285 Mich. 500;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. ReeseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Morales v. Michigan Parole Bd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Triplett v. Deputy Warden, Jackson PrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. PriceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- In Re CasellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. CovingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.