Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Palm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1931No. Calendar 36,121PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

It being represented by petition that Fred Palm, confined in the State prison at Jackson, is unlawfully deprived of his liberty, we issued our writ of habeas corpus, directed to the warden. The return of the warden shows that, on September 29, 1927, in the circuit court for the county of Ingham, upon his pleas of guilty to informations charging him with illegal possession of intoxicating liquor, and that he had previously been convicted of six felonies, Fred Palm was convicted and sentenced to the State prison for life; that on January 15, 1930, the governor of the State commuted the sentence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Goto v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Bolln v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. People v. PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. PiaseckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re BrazelMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API