Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sebring v. Dowd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cubiam:

Relator and his wife are owners by the entirety of real property in the city of Corning, which in the year 1921 was assessed at $30,000. The assessment is attacked for overvaluation and inequality. The finding below was that the full value “ exceeded the sum of $30,000.” 1. That rather indefinite valuation may be sustained on the evidence. We do not, however, agree with statements made by the assessors and by the court below as to the proper basis of valuation for taxation. Primarily the basis.in the case of residential property should be the market value. (Matter of Daly v. Smith,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daly v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. People Ex Rel. Strong v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central New York Mortgage & Title Co. v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People ex rel. Schick v. MarvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In re DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. People ex rel. Ryder v. WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API