People ex rel. Sebring v. Dowd
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
The general impression made from the reading of the testimony in this case is that the conclusion arrived at by the referee is reasonable and should be sustained. The estimates of valuation of the respective witnesses have the usual variations; in this instance, those of the relator placing the value from $13,000 to $20,000, and those of the defendants from $65,000 to $75,000. This evidence of experts is not of much assistance to the court. They cannot both be correct.
*661In June, 1921, the relator’s property had a value somewhere between the lowest and the highest estimate. The assessment for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parmenter v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- People ex rel. New York Stock Exchange Building Co. v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- People Ex Rel. Strong v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929