Legal Opinion

In re Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Final order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and conclusion of law disapproved in part. Memorandum: Our review of the record in this proceeding leads to the conclusion that the values of the three separate properties involved, as fixed by the judgment herein, are supported by proof of various factors properly to be considered in determining the value of real estate for purposes of assessment and taxation. (People ex rel. Strong v. Hart, 216 N. Y. 513, 517; People ex rel. Sebring v. Dowd, 206 App. Div. 727, 728 ; Heiman v. Bishop, 272 N. Y.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heiman v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. People Ex Rel. Strong v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API