Legal Opinion
Ferrisburgh Realty Investors v. Schumacher
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 4, 2010No. 2008-077PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. Developer Ferrisburgh Realty Investors (FRI) appeals from the trial court’s decision, following a jury verdict, in this contract dispute. Landowner Robert Schumacher cross-appeals. FRI argues that the court erred by: (1) denying its request to allow certain claims to go to the jury; (2) refusing to allow it' to amend its complaint to add a new claim; (3) reducing the jury’s award of damages; and (4) denying its request for injunctive relief. Landowner asserts that the court erred in: (1) finding an enforceable contract; and (2) upholding the punitive damages award. With the exception of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Deloitte & Touche LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Colby v. Umbrella, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Lillicrap v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Bloomer v. GibsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- McMurphy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gregg Beldock v. VWSD, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- Langlois v. Town of ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- David Tanzer v. MyWebGrocer, Inc., Richard E. Tarrant, Jr. and Jeremiah F. TarrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Madowitz, Kohl and Amherst Realty, LLC v. The Woods at Killington Owners' Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.