Legal Opinion

McMurphy v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 2, 2000No. 98-499PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

In this wrongful death action following the death of their daughter in an automobile accident, plaintiffs Bonnie McMurphy and James Hart appeal a summary judgment ruling that defendants State of Vermont and Town of Rutland were immune from suit. Plaintiffs argue that, under the Tort Claims Act, the State waived its sovereign immunity, and, by purchasing excess liability insurance, Rutland waived its municipal immunity up to $1,850,000. Plaintiffs argue, in the alternative, that Rutland is liable under the theory of breach of contract, a claim that is not subject to immunity. We affirm in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Morrisville Lumber Co., Inc. v. OkcuogluSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Brennan v. Town of ColchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. LaShay v. Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Marshall v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Powers v. Office of Child SupportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Searles v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Sweet v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Knelman v. Middlebury CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
  5. In re 204 North Avenue NOV (Pierre Gingue, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API