Legal Opinion

State v. Commerford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 12, 1993No. 10475PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (1) and attempted assault in the *28first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-59 (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court failed to instruct the jury properly with respect to the intent required to commit a criminal attempt, (2) the trial court improperly failed to give the defendant’s requested instruction on witness credibility, and (3) the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. OsmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. WatlingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Heritage Village Master Ass'n v. Heritage Village Water Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. State v. BrooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Coble v. MaloneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API