Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Morris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 27, 2000No. 1990485Published

1Dissent

Suppose we sustain the order to arbitrate. What can the arbitrator do?

The arbitration paragraph expressly states, in pertinent part: "Therefore, the award shall not, and the arbitrator shall not have the power or authority to, hold Terminix responsible for (i) the repair or replacement of any termite damage to the identified property other thannew termite damage as defined in this Plan. . . ." (Emphasis added.) The "Termite Protection Plan" containing the arbitration paragraph provides that the definition of "new damage" "excludes damage existing at the inception date." Thus the arbitration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Robert L. Zink v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. Peter A. ChildsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. First Family Financial Services, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Crimson Industries, Inc. v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. SyvrudSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API