Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1998No. 1951866PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dan Tucker Auto Sales, Inc. ("Tucker"), the defendant in an action pending in the Jefferson circuit Court, petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson circuit Court 1) to withdraw its order of July 29, 1996, directing Tucker to pay an arbitration filing fee and 2) to require the plaintiff, John Phelps, to pay that filing fee. We grant the petition. We conclude that Phelps, who filed the complaint in the circuit court, is the "claimant" and the "initiating party" for purposes of interpreting Rule 6 of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA").

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. P & S BUSINESS v. South Cent. Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. PACIFIC ENT. OIL v. Howell PetroleumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Lilley v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. BrunoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API