American Life Ins. Co. v. Carlton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This is the second appeal in this cause. When before this court the party plaintiff was indicated to be the personal representative of decedent and not the beneficiary. The amendment on the second trial was accordingly made. American Life Ins. Co. v. Carlton, 236 Ala. 609, 184 So. 171; Benson v. Robinson, 223 Ala. 85, 134 So. 799.
The reasonable rule declared by our court is that where the bill of exceptions recites that it contains all the evidence, and it is shown that it does not contain all of the evidence, the appellate court will not pass on questions or rulings which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Prudential Casualty Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Alabama Terminal R. R. v. BennsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Bolton v. CuthbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Childs v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- American Life Ins. Co. of Alabama v. CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942