Huff v. Standard Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION OF RECUSAL AND REJECTING AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 144
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief Judge.
On the eve of trial, plaintiff filed a third motion for recusal of the Honorable Norman C. Roettger, Jr., presiding judge 1 in this case.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 144 2 permits any party to file one “timely and sufficient affidavit” for the purpose of disqualifying the judge presiding in the case. Clearly, the first two motions alleging bias and prejudice, although not accompanied by an affidavit required by the statute, were in truth and fact attempts under § 144 to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Eisler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. ReimerdesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- United States v. CraigDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- Marozsan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.