In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
In deciding the sensitive question of whether to recuse ..., the test of impartiality is what a reasonable person, knowing and understanding all the facts and circumstances, would believe. It is for that reason that we cannot adopt a per se rule holding that when someone claims to see smoke, we must find that there is fire. That which is seen is sometimes merely a smokescreen. Judicial inquiry may not therefore be defined by what appears in the press. If such were the case, those litigants fortunate enough to have easy access to the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, INC. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- DELGADO-O'NEIL v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.