Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament & Codicils of Baldwin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether the will in question was executed in accordance with the statutory requirements is, under the circumstances of this case, a question of fact. (Matter of Eldred, 109 App. Div. 777.) This court is required to review the facts de novo. (Surrogate’s Court Act, § 309.)

Catharine A. Baldwin, deceased, was evidently a very intelligent woman who was in the habit of transacting business. She drew her will in her own handwriting, including a full attestation clause. The surviving witness testified that she did not see the testatrix sign the will, that she did not see the testatrix’s signature…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of CottrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Wyman v. WymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Wyman v. . WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. In re the Probate of Last Will & Testament of EldredAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of JacobsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of HockNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of AbareNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  5. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of DodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API