Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury’s finding that the deceased did not duly subscribe the will in the presence of the attesting witnesses and that he did not duly acknowledge his signature to them, was against the weight of the evidence.

Each of the subscribing witnesses was over seventy years of age at the time of the trial, held almost eighteen years after the will had been executed. At one time these witnesses testified they did not see the testator sign nor did they see his signature on the instrument when they affixed their names, and at another they swore they did not recall what happened. Nevertheless, there was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SizerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. In Re the Probate of Will of SizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament & Codicils of BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of ZipkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of CharapNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  5. In re the Probate of the Will of CotterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API