In re the Estate of Hock
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Whereas in the ordinary litigation a judicial determination in favor of a party bearing the burden of proof would be unwarranted where the sole fact demonstrated by the witnesses was that they were unmitigated liars, there is a fortunate exception to this rule in certain probate contests. The exhibition in the case at bar renders this observation apposite.
The record demonstrates that at the time of the occurrences in question the decedent was forty-eight years of age, of sound mind, conceded testamentary capacity, very intelligent, a good business man and that he was commander of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Orser v. . OrserNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- In Re the Revocation of the Last Will & Testament of NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SizerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- In Re the Probate of Will of SizerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of ThompsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
- In re the Probate of the Will of ZipkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of SamelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963