Legal Opinion

Transpac Drilling Venture, 1983-2 by James M. Dobbins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 15, 1996No. 95-5100PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether the United States Court of Federal Claims correctly held that assessments of additional partnership tax liability made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue were timely. See Transpac Drilling Venture, 1983-2 v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 810 (1995). The assessments resulted from the disallowance of improperly taken business deductions. We affirm.

I

A. The basic facts, as set forth in the opinion of the Court of Federal Claims, are undisputed.

The appellant, Transpac Drilling Venture 1983-2 (Transpac), is one of a group of 51…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Kazimir C. And Anna M. Bahoric, Anna M. Bahoric, and Kazimir C. Bahoric v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Transpac Drilling Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Jade Trading, LLC ex rel. Ervin Capital, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Transpac Drilling Venture 1982-12, Guy J. Cutili v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Keener v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API